only search Nicholsclan

Random Glimpses

Site Notes

About this site -- This site is a place to keep and share the somewhat random musings, rants, and observations which otherwise clutter my brain. I hate clutter.

Comments Policy -- Comments will never be censored based on political or ideological point of view. However, comments will be deleted that are abusive, off-topic, use excessive foul language, or include ad hominem attacks. Comments are pre-moderated, meaning they will not be posted immediately.

Links

Kim's Blog

Tyler's Site

Tim's Time

Email the Blog at

blog@nicholsclan.com

Archives

March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008

Powered By Blogger TM

Tuesday, December 21, 2004

What's Left Behind...
Suzanne Fields makes a point here that we are behind other countries in Math and Science and it is just a disgrace. I agree. I also think this is a logical outcome of our current pedagogical philosophy coupled with recent government plans to "fix things".

In the study Fields references, the U.S. is performing in the top 10 for science and the top 20 for math. That is clearly not a shabby performance. That still puts us in the 90% percentile of nations on the planet. Yet she laments that we didn't "win". Well frankly, we're not trying to. Current trends in education are focusing on the philosophy of "No Child Left Behind". The federal program aside, the idea is clear, we don't want anyone to fail. But what we seem to be losing site of is that not losing is a very different strategy than winning. Looked at statistically, raising the average is not the same as minimizing the deviation. The tools you employ to achieve those goals are different - especially in an arena where resources are finite. And yes, the resources we can pour into education are finite.

There is a Darwinian aspect to life that modern U.S. culture seems unwilling to acknowledge. Life, by it's very nature exists across the full spectrum. And while everyone is created equal under the law, that does not make them equal in ability.

I'm not suggesting that we abandon the intellectually challenged, but in the same spirit that not all kids will be varsity athletes, a start would be to acknowledge that all kids are not great scholars. In the same way that gangly kids still take gym class and play youth soccer, opportunities and encouragement should continue to exist for all students. But does it make sense as a coach to focus on getting the kid picking grass in the goal to play at an average level, or to focus on training your best athletes and hope to inspire some grass pickers along the way?

Until scholarship in general is seen as a good thing; until we elevate exceptional students to the level of exceptional athletes; we will not win the battle for global scholarship excellence. We are a long way from that world. We focus most of our energy on getting the grass pickers to engage. Meanwhile, our stars get ignored and even ostracized for having the audacity to play better than their peers. This is not a strategy to win.
--> Posted at 8:00 AM

 

Comments: Post a Comment


<< Home