only search Nicholsclan

Random Glimpses

Site Notes

About this site -- This site is a place to keep and share the somewhat random musings, rants, and observations which otherwise clutter my brain. I hate clutter.

Comments Policy -- Comments will never be censored based on political or ideological point of view. However, comments will be deleted that are abusive, off-topic, use excessive foul language, or include ad hominem attacks. Comments are pre-moderated, meaning they will not be posted immediately.

Links

Kim's Blog

Tyler's Site

Tim's Time

Email the Blog at

blog@nicholsclan.com

Archives

March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008

Powered By Blogger TM

Wednesday, September 01, 2004

You'll want to sit down and take a deep breath before you continue to read. I'm going to defend the president. Our president... of the U.S.... Mr. Bush... really I am.

He's been taking a beating of late for saying we can't win the war on terror. The trouble is, like so many things in politics, that statement was taken out of context. What he actually said when asked if we could win the war on terror was,
"I don't think you can win it. I think you can create conditions so that those who use terror as a tool are less acceptable in parts of the world."
He's right about that. The war, as it were, cannot be won in the conventional sense. The best we can hope for is to create a sufficient deterrent such that terror ceases to become the tool of choice.

I'm sorry, but the democrats are idiots for drilling Bush on saying the war can't be won. It would be much more effective to point out that he has obviously conceded that there is no point at which we will be able to declare "Mission Accomplished".

The war on terror is much like the so-called war on drugs. Massive enforcement efforts have spent lots of money, incarcerated many, and done little to stem the demand for drugs. Less direct programs which remove the desire or social acceptability of drugs are ultimately the only way to "win". And even then, it requires ongoing vigilance. There is no point that you can walk away from the drug issue and assume you've licked the problem. Like dandelions in your yard, it will rear it's head as soon as you ignore it.

So why Mr. Bush, given that you now claim to understand the true nature of the terror issue, are you still actively pursuing a military solution? You cannot drive terror into submission by force. You only push it further underground and steel its resolve. Ultimately making the situation worse if you ever yield the force which is holding the terror at bay. You acknowledge that there is no exit strategy for the military effort you have launched. You acknowledge that the military cannot achieve your stated objective. Yet you relentlessly pursue the course anyway.

Your quote above, taken in it's full context, gives me a ray of hope that you at long last understand the implications of what you've led us into. Yet your reelection campaign is predicated on "staying the course". Talk about being between rocks and hard places...
--> Posted at 1:36 PM

 

Comments: Post a Comment


<< Home